Re: [boost] [c++1] BOOST_NOEXCEPT macros?

Subject: Re: [boost] [c++1] BOOST_NOEXCEPT macros?
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-31 07:38:56

Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Do note that we're discussing the effects on C++03 code in this context. 
> The change is from no exception specification to throw() or its 
> compiler-specific equivalent.
>
> What have I misunderstood?

Compiler-specific nothrow decorations don't call std::unexpected and don't 
insert try blocks.