Subject: Re: [boost] [c++1] BOOST_NOEXCEPT macros?
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-31 07:38:56
Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Do note that we're discussing the effects on C++03 code in this context.
> The change is from no exception specification to throw() or its
> compiler-specific equivalent.
> What have I misunderstood?
Compiler-specific nothrow decorations don't call std::unexpected and don't
insert try blocks.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk