Subject: Re: [boost] [c++1] BOOST_NOEXCEPT macros?
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-31 08:13:26
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Stewart, Robert wrote:
> > Do note that we're discussing the effects on C++03 code in
> > this context. The change is from no exception specification
> > to throw() or its compiler-specific equivalent.
> > What have I misunderstood?
> Compiler-specific nothrow decorations don't call
> std::unexpected and don't insert try blocks.
Well that's an important difference. In that case, it does seem reasonable that BOOST_NOEXCEPT could insert the compiler-specific decorations without adverse effect on existing C++03 code.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk