Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] scoped_array / shared_array (size_t)constructor
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-05 08:09:56
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > well, is the expected behavior. Every smart pointer tries to mimic raw
> > pointers and the constructor ambiguity reduces this similarity. I also
> > don't
> > want to update my code when it breaks.
> What's the problem with updating your code?
It's not fun, especially when the cause is a component that has been stable
for what, a decade now?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk