Subject: Re: [boost] Library categories
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-22 18:01:19
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 22 November 2011 22:18, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I have committed the proposed changes as suggested in
>> Please, let me know if there is something wrong with the new categories.
> I've had a quick look and it's good. The following is all IMO so do
> disregard if you disagree. I find some of the new categories to be
> quite specific, but then so are some of the old ones. I don't like
> 'Idioms' and 'patterns' much, maybe they could be combined, or does
> that contradict your intent? Miscellaneous should probably stay at the
> end, and not contain libraries that now have another home.
The compact (one line per lib) format is nice. Can't the same format
be used for http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk