Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Library categories
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-22 18:01:19

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 22 November 2011 22:18, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I have committed the proposed changes as suggested in
>> Please, let me know if there is something wrong with the new categories.
> I've had a quick look and it's good. The following is all IMO so do
> disregard if you disagree. I find some of the new categories to be
> quite specific, but then so are some of the old ones. I don't like
> 'Idioms' and 'patterns' much, maybe they could be combined, or does
> that contradict your intent? Miscellaneous should probably stay at the
> end, and not contain libraries that now have another home.

The compact (one line per lib) format is nice. Can't the same format
be used for


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at