Subject: Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-24 11:54:12
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Dean Michael Berris
> <mikhailberis_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> 3) [MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL] This thread is about "should new libraries
>>> implementing C++11 features in C++03" be considered for admission in
>>> Boost or not. It's not about the usefulness of Local, namespace,
>>> struct, Phoenix, etc. Let's all try to provide the review manager with
>>> this piece of information about C++11, C++03, and Boost.
>> But I've already done that part -- see my first response.
>> I responded to your post because you brought up the comparison with
>> Phoenix. I don't know if you noticed but the context of my whole reply
>> was exactly that, the relationship between C++11, C++03, and Boost
>> where the case in point is the Local library under review.
> OK, can you please summarize your position with respect to C++11 and
> C++03 libraries here for me once again? Just a couple of sentences
> will be enough. Thanks a lot :)
Here it is: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/225871
-- Dean Michael Berris http://goo.gl/CKCJX
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk