Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Algorithms organization question
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-14 13:52:33
On Dec 14, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Without providing everything from C++11, that header would be a lie. That is, if you provide a file named algorithm in such a directory, it should contain everything from the standard, shouldn't it? Otherwise, we'd use namespace boost and expect less certain coverage.
There are some things in the C++11 library that require new language features (such as rvalue-references)
I don't see any way to implement them identically using only C++03.
Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>
A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
-- Yu Suzuki
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk