Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Math and Math Constants
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-17 18:28:56
on Wed Dec 14 2011, "Paul A. Bristow" <pbristow-AT-hetp.u-net.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of John
>> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 9:42 AM
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Math and Math Constants
> Thanks for all who contributed to this thread, especially an interesting idea to allow partial
> specialization (which we are thinking about - well actually, so far the organ grinder is ;-).
> But nobody has really answered this part of my original questions -
> "Does this change need a formal (mini-)review?"
The answer to that question is pretty much always "no."
Changes of any scale are up to the library maintainer.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk