Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] Timed locks
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-29 17:46:55
El 29/12/2011 12:24, Olaf van der Spek escribió:
> 2011/12/29 Ion Gaztañaga<igaztanaga_at_[hidden]>:
>>>> Consistency with the C++11 standard threading would dictate providing
>>>> both interfaces (but using chrono instead of posix_time I think)
>> Yes, there is a plan to update to C++11 interface when some other issues
>> with other libraries (container, intrusive, mainly) are also updated to
>> C++11 changes (allocator_traits, pointer_traits, initializer_lists...).
> What's the reason to wait?
A day has only 24 hours ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk