Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] Timed locks
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-29 06:24:06
2011/12/29 Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]>:
>>> Consistency with the C++11 standard threading would dictate providing
>>> both interfaces (but using chrono instead of posix_time I think)
> Yes, there is a plan to update to C++11 interface when some other issues
> with other libraries (container, intrusive, mainly) are also updated to
> C++11 changes (allocator_traits, pointer_traits, initializer_lists...).
What's the reason to wait?