Subject: Re: [boost] boost modularisation status?
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-01 21:34:15
On 1/1/2012 8:23 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Note that I'm not completely against the adoption of CMake, as it could
> have some advantages, but the liabilities should be considered also when
> the decision will be taken. For that we need to start a discussion,
> goals, documentation, who will take the decision, ....
Have you read the previous, as in previous few years, of discussions
about cmake vs. b2?
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk