Subject: Re: [boost] boost modularisation status?
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-01 22:54:09
> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 20:34:15 -0600
> From: grafikrobot_at_[hidden]
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] boost modularisation status?
> On 1/1/2012 8:23 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> > Note that I'm not completely against the adoption of CMake, as it could
> > have some advantages, but the liabilities should be considered also when
> > the decision will be taken. For that we need to start a discussion,
> > goals, documentation, who will take the decision, ....
> Have you read the previous, as in previous few years, of discussions
> about cmake vs. b2?
Could someone with links to these discussions be kind enough to post
them? I would like to read them as well.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk