Re: [boost] [thread] Reducing the number of open tickets.

Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] Reducing the number of open tickets.
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-03 13:10:41

Le 03/01/12 18:50, Anthony Williams a écrit :
> On 03/01/12 17:28, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>> Le 29/12/11 15:26, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a écrit :
>>> Le 17/12/11 15:35, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a écrit :
>>>> Le 05/12/11 12:02, Anthony Williams a écrit :
>>>>> On 04/12/11 23:56, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>>>>>> Le 03/12/11 18:23, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anthony, please take a look at them and merge whatever you 
>>>>>> consider is
>>>>>> good after the testers have the time to take them in account (not
>>>>>> before
>>>>>> the 12/12/2011)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for doing this Vicente. I will take a look when the tests
>>>>> have cycled, and merge them to release.
>>>>>
>>>> Any news on that?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Vicente
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>>>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>>>>
>>> Anthony, I would like to continue committing other patch for other
>>> tickets,
>>>
>>> #5351 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5351> interrupt a
>>> future get boost::unknown_exception
>>> <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5351>
>>> #5990 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5990>
>>> shared_future<T>::get() has wrong return type
>>> <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5990>
>>> #6174 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6174> packaged_task
>>> doesn't correctly handle moving results
>>> <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6174>
>>> #5516 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5516> Upgrade lock is
>>> not acquired when previous upgrade lock releases if another read lock
>>> is present <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5516>
>>>
>>> Part of #6195 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6195> c++11
>>> compliance: Provide the standard time related interface using
>>> Boost.Chrono <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6195>
>>>
>>> but I would prefer if you merge before the current state on trunk.
>>> The date limit to merge to release for 1.49 is very close. If you have
>>> no time to do the merge I could do it, but I really prefer that you do
>>> it so that the modifications are inspected.
>>>
>>> Please, let me know.
>>>
>> Anthony,
>>
>> I guess you are very busy, so I will merge to release, so that I will
>> continue the work on the trunk.
>
> I'm in the middle of doing the merge. There's a change to a 
> WaitForMultipleObjects call that changes a true parameter to false for 
> Windows CE that I need to check.
>
> Anthony

Hrrr,

I've committed already. The change id needed as documented in the ticket 
(https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5594). Of course I had no the 
platform to test it :(

MSDN for WaitForMultipleObjects? 
<https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/WaitForMultipleObjects> under 
Windows CE 6.0 can be found 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa915354.aspx.

Sorry,
Vicente