Subject: Re: [boost] Request for Interest in several Modules
From: Fernando Pelliccioni (fpelliccioni_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-10 11:48:44
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Christof Donat <cd_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I have several modules/libraries I developed and released under Boost
>> - CppDB Sql Connectivity
>> - Stack Trace
>> - Shared Object Loading
>> - Nowide UTF-8 friendly standard C/C++ library API.
I am interested in the four libraries.
> I already had a look into your cppcms a while ago, which I mostly liked.
> Sadly I did not really get around to try and write an application with it.
> The biggest drawback for me is the use of "booster" instead of boost. I
> know that there might me situations where a stable ABI is important, but
> for me it is not. So I'd prefer to simply use boost there. Do you think,
> there might be a compile time option to chose either?
I share the thought of Christof about Booster versus Boost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk