Subject: Re: [boost] [c++TR2] N3334, Proposing array_ref<T> and string_ref
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-31 13:22:59
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> > What do other Boosters think?
> I think the idea is great. In fact, I've written similiar
I wrote and use a string_ref class. I made no attempt to support wchar_t. It provides a constructor for std::vector<char>, besides the constructors given in N3334. I also have a const_substring type for which there's a constructor. The list can grow large, of course, so relying on conversions to string_ref from other string-like types is reasonable.
I don't agree with replicating std::string's too large interface in string_ref. I'd prefer to use free functions to augment the functionality.
> N3334 does not really address the (const void*, size_t) case.
They support that for string_ref, but not array_ref. Go figure.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk