Subject: Re: [boost] RFC: runtime-flexible arrays
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-16 11:20:31
Le 16/02/2012 15:21, Mathias Gaunard a écrit :
> But mixing operations between different storage orders just causes
> massive amount of problems if you want to vectorize and use the cache
> efficiently, so we don't support it.
We dont support it exactly for that. One possible solution was to use
the majority storage order but it leads to poor performance. I didn't
find any use case where such mix was required.
> I don't think we really have native support for transposed views other
> than with the actual type of the expression template trans(a).
and transconj for complex but htis was a given.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk