Subject: Re: [boost] [git] neglected aspects
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-27 15:35:58
on Wed Feb 08 2012, Julian Gonggrijp <j.gonggrijp-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Steven Samuel Cole
>> <steven.samuel.cole_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I've never used git, but I have used bzr. Having worked with a dvcs,
>> the disadvantages of svn become quite clear. Svn *might* be fine for
>> personal (one dev) projects, but for bigger projects it's just not the
>> right option.
>> I can't think of any real downsides.
> I found out that John Wiegley has been working on a faithful
> conversion of the boost svn tree to git, see . Is that effort still
> Also, there has been a very interesting discussion on branching model
> and release process, which seems to have started with . Two
> subthreads particularly interested me, i.e. the one starting in 
> and another one starting just before  (especially the dialogue
> between Vladimir Prus and Dave Abrahams).
> This might have been mentioned before, but gitflow seems to be ideal.
I hope we'll be using git-flow.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk