Subject: Re: [boost] Shit. Looks like I broke something
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-04 14:37:00
On 03/04/2012 08:22 AM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> Am 04.03.2012 16:11, schrieb Steven Watanabe:
>> Fixed in r77218.
> sorry - r77218 does not fix things - you only removed the test of
> '<address-model>32' in libs/context/build/Jamfile.
Huh? r77218 didn't remove anything. I just
shuffled the aliases around so the deduced
architecture and address-model only affected
selecting the correct alternative, not
the build commands.
> I believe this is not the correct way because ARMv8 does support 64bit
> with its A64 extensions.
> Without the test in Jamfile I can not select the correct assembler
> (32bit/64bit version).
> So I request you the revert it and apply my previous patch again.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk