Re: [boost] Shit. Looks like I broke something

Subject: Re: [boost] Shit. Looks like I broke something
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-04 14:45:44

Am 04.03.2012 20:37, schrieb Steven Watanabe:
> AMDG
>
> On 03/04/2012 08:22 AM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
>> Am 04.03.2012 16:11, schrieb Steven Watanabe:
>>> Fixed in r77218.
>> sorry - r77218 does not fix things - you only removed the test of
>> '<address-model>32' in libs/context/build/Jamfile.
> Huh?  r77218 didn't remove anything.  I just
> shuffled the aliases around so the deduced
> architecture and address-model only affected
> selecting the correct alternative, not
> the build commands.

Hmm - I thought I was testing for the architecture and address-model in 
the Jamfile and was wondering that it seamed to be vanished?!

Anyway - ARM has published its new 64bit ARMv8 architecture last year - 
I believe gcc-4.7
supports the new instruction-set.

Would it be easy to prepare boost.build for it?

Oliver