Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: extended complex number library
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-07 17:10:39
On 03/07/2012 11:42 AM, Matthieu Schaller wrote:
> Dear all,
> Thanks for your comments.
> How about having a boost::real<T> (or whatever you want to name it),
> that references a complex number with an imaginary part set to 0?
> This could in principle be done but I don't think that it is a good
> thing to do. boost::real<> would be a wrapper around the double type
> say. Now, this would require to rewrite all the mathematical functions
> for this type. Furthermore, people doing numerical sciences will
> probably not be keen to drop the use of native POD variable for simple
> It is true that some functions could be modified to return complex
> values instead of NaNs but this would come at a performance cost when
> performing real only computations.
How does that not apply to boost::imaginary<T>?
A complex has a real and imaginary part.
boost::imaginary<T> is a complex with an imaginary part set to 0.
The counterpart for the real part should also exist.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk