Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: extended complex number library
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-07 17:12:05
On 03/06/2012 07:49 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> you are right. The goal been to provide a faster library implies that
> the Boost library should use the standard library when the standard is
> more efficient, and we could expect that the standard is faster for the
> scope it covers.
What about correctness?
Most implementations of standard library functions on complex numbers
are not correct from a numerical point of view.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk