Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: extended complex number library
From: Christopher Jefferson (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-07 17:20:03
On 7 Mar 2012, at 22:12, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> On 03/06/2012 07:49 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>> you are right. The goal been to provide a faster library implies that
>> the Boost library should use the standard library when the standard is
>> more efficient, and we could expect that the standard is faster for the
>> scope it covers.
> What about correctness?
> Most implementations of standard library functions on complex numbers are not correct from a numerical point of view.
Really? Can you give some examples? Have you reported these issues to the various compiler designers?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk