Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [boost] workarounf for missing uintptr_t on PGI?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-08 02:22:14

Next message: christophe jean-joseph: "[boost] Using an element of a class A in a constructor of a class B (reflection with boost::python)"
Previous message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [Config] Meaning of BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_INITIALIZER_LIST"
Next in thread: Lars Viklund: "Re: [boost] workarounf for missing uintptr_t on PGI?"
Reply: Lars Viklund: "Re: [boost] workarounf for missing uintptr_t on PGI?"

Hi,
the PGI compiler (pgi- 11.9) seams not to support intptr_t and uninptr_t.
Does boost provide a workaround I'm not aware of?

Is the PGI compiler relevant (== does it matter if unit-test fails for PGI but pass GCC, MSVC, INTEL)?

Oliver

-- 
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

Next message: christophe jean-joseph: "[boost] Using an element of a class A in a constructor of a class B (reflection with boost::python)"
Previous message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [Config] Meaning of BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_INITIALIZER_LIST"
Next in thread: Lars Viklund: "Re: [boost] workarounf for missing uintptr_t on PGI?"
Reply: Lars Viklund: "Re: [boost] workarounf for missing uintptr_t on PGI?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk