Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Meaning of BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_INITIALIZER_LIST
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-08 05:15:08
> Now there's a hoot.
> I just finished searching for BOOST_NO_STD_UNORDERED to see if anyone in
> boost was using it - with the same idea.
> In all the cases that I've looked at, if BOOST_NO_STD_UNORDERED is set, so
> are BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_UNORDERED_MAP and BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_UNORDERED_SET
> However, there are cases where BOOST_NO_STD_UNORDERED is _not_ set, and
> the other ones are.
> [ I think those might be bugs. ]
> We could just say that BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_UNORDERED_SET is a synonym for
> BOOST_NO_STD_UNORDERED, and is the preferred replacement.
Agreed we should deprecate BOOST_NO_STD_UNORDERED - but I would set it if
*either* of BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_UNORDERED_SET or
BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_UNORDERED_MAP is set (since it implies both).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk