Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Meaning of BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_INITIALIZER_LIST
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-08 13:32:42
> There's some serious weirdnesses in the logic of defining
> BOOST_NO_STD_UNORDERED; can you take a look at the STLPort configuration
> and let me know what you think should be done there?
Shucks, not sure :-(
My suspicion is that STLport had std::unordered_* for a while (inherited
from the old SGI STL), then moved them into std::tr1:: and now back to std::
Of course the early versions probably aren't completely compatible with what
ended up in the std either :-(
I guess just remove the code that sets BOOST_NO_STD_UNORDERED here, and
stick with the original plan, if that breaks obsolete STLport versions then
too bad I guess....?
> Also, is there/should there be a relationship between
> BOOST_NO_STD_UNORDERED and BOOST_HAS_TR1_HDR_UNORDERED_MAP/SET?
Not quite as the former relates to what's in std:: and the latter std::tr1::
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk