Subject: Re: [boost] [algorithm] aesthetic question about cxx11
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-10 12:13:48
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 5:44 PM, lcaminiti <lorcaminiti_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Then I think we can proclame Boost convention to be .[ch]pp for file names,
> CXX for macros, and cxx for directories (and also cxx for code symbol names
> other than macros?).
Why cxx for dirs? Then we've got cpp for one path component and cxx for another?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk