Re: [boost] [algorithm] aesthetic question about cxx11

Subject: Re: [boost] [algorithm] aesthetic question about cxx11
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-10 12:13:48

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 5:44 PM, lcaminiti <lorcaminiti_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Then I think we can proclame Boost convention to be .[ch]pp for file names,
> CXX for macros, and cxx for directories (and also cxx for code symbol names
> other than macros?).

Why cxx for dirs? Then we've got cpp for one path component and cxx for another?

-- 
Olaf