Subject: Re: [boost] [algorithm] aesthetic question about cxx11
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-10 12:25:31
Olaf van der Spek-3 wrote
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 5:44 PM, lcaminiti <lorcaminiti@> wrote:
>> Then I think we can proclame Boost convention to be .[ch]pp for file
>> CXX for macros, and cxx for directories (and also cxx for code symbol
>> other than macros?).
> Why cxx for dirs? Then we've got cpp for one path component and cxx for
OK, honestly the convention that would make the most sense to me (as long as
it doesn't break any exiting code) is cpp/hpp/CPP for everything files,
directory, and code symbols (including macros). But I'm happy to just pick a
convention and move on with my life ;)
I can't make the final call on my own-- Boost developers, what do you think
the convention should be here?
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-algorithm-aesthetic-question-about-cxx11-tp4422682p4462507.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk