Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 1.49 BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS(): causes build failures; would like a boost maintainer comment
From: Steve M. Robbins (steve_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-13 09:26:06
Thanks a bunch for the detailed explanation. I think I know how to
fix the one package that I know has been broken by this.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 04:49:26PM +0000, Paul Mensonides wrote:
> I suppose that I *could* define all of these (it isn't just
> BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS) to have values in the non-iterating case such as:
> #define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS_0() 0
> // etc.
If I were to pursue this option, which other macros would need to be
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk