Subject: Re: [boost] has_member_fnc?
From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-16 14:15:34
Nathan Ridge wrote:
>> It seems c++11 has a new way to spell enable_if, and this can be used to
>> implement has_member_fnc, as in this example:
>> I wonder if has_member_fnc would be a good addition to boost?
> Does Boost.TTI not already have a facility to test for the existence of a
> member function?
> Or is what you had in mind something different?
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
What is the status of TTI? I don't see it in 1.49.0.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk