Subject: Re: [boost] has_member_fnc?
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-17 09:32:40
On 3/16/2012 2:15 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Nathan Ridge wrote:
>>> It seems c++11 has a new way to spell enable_if, and this can be used to
>>> implement has_member_fnc, as in this example:
>>> I wonder if has_member_fnc would be a good addition to boost?
>> Does Boost.TTI not already have a facility to test for the existence of a
>> member function?
>> Or is what you had in mind something different?
>> Unsubscribe& other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> What is the status of TTI? I don't see it in 1.49.0.
This is my fault. I have not had the chance of working on TTI to get it
into an upcoming Boost release. I will be working on it more so I hope
to get it into a Boost release in the near future. Apologies to all
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk