Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [boost] Java bindings for boost (was RE: [git] Mercurial?)
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-19 15:41:06

Next message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"
Previous message: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"
In reply to: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"
Next in thread: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] Java bindings for boost (was RE: [git] Mercurial?)"
Reply: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] Java bindings for boost (was RE: [git] Mercurial?)"

Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> Dave Abrahams wrote:
> > IMO, no. There are several reasons, but the main one is that Git is
> > winning in the marketplace.
>
> You're kidding right? If not - let's switch Boost to Java - it's way
> more popular!

As a first step, boost could provide Java bindings similar to the existing python bindings. Anyone?

Regards,
Thomas

Next message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"
Previous message: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"
In reply to: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"
Next in thread: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] Java bindings for boost (was RE: [git] Mercurial?)"
Reply: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] Java bindings for boost (was RE: [git] Mercurial?)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk