Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-19 15:31:03
> on Mon Mar 19 2012, Daryle Walker <darylew-AT-hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Git has a competitor called Mercurial? If we're moving to a
> > Distributed-VCS, should we go to Mercurial instead of Git?
> IMO, no. There are several reasons, but the main one is that Git is
> winning in the marketplace.
You're kidding right? If not - let's switch Boost to Java - it's way more
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk