Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-19 16:02:34

Next message: Marco Cecchetti: "[boost] new Overload library version"
Previous message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [mpl] +[fusion] + [phoenix] undocumented hard-coded limit=50"
In reply to: Bryce Lelbach: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"

On 19/03/12 20:54, Bryce Lelbach wrote:

> Uh, can you provide some data for this, please?
>
> The two major surveys I know contradict this.
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/org/community_survey/Eclipse_Survey_2011_Report.pdf, page 16
> http://blogs.forrester.com/application_development/2010/01/forrester-databyte-developer-scm-tool-adoption-and-use.html

Git is the first DVCS according to both those surveys.

What were you trying to say? That subversion is still a lot more popular
than Git?

Next message: Marco Cecchetti: "[boost] new Overload library version"
Previous message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [mpl] +[fusion] + [phoenix] undocumented hard-coded limit=50"
In reply to: Bryce Lelbach: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk