Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-19 21:52:36
on Mon Mar 19 2012, "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kaiser-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>> on Mon Mar 19 2012, Bryce Lelbach <blelbach-AT-cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
>> > The two major surveys I know contradict this.
>> > http://www.eclipse.org/org/community_survey/Eclipse_Survey_2011_Report
>> > .pdf, page 16
>> > http://blogs.forrester.com/application_development/2010/01/forrester-d
>> > atabyte-developer-scm-tool-adoption-and-use.html
>> Contradict what?
> Well, it contradicts your claim that 'Git is winning in the marketplace',
> which is total nonsense if you look at the surveys (SVN 50% vs. GIT 13%
If you read the thread carefully, you'll see I was talking about the
DVCS marketplace (in fact, just about Git vs Mercurial), where SVN is
not a contender. Please tone down the 'tude, friend.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk