Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-20 08:25:58
> >> > The two major surveys I know contradict this.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.eclipse.org/org/community_survey/Eclipse_Survey_2011_Rep
> >> > ort
> >> > .pdf, page 16
> >> > http://blogs.forrester.com/application_development/2010/01/forreste
> >> > r-d atabyte-developer-scm-tool-adoption-and-use.html
> >> Contradict what?
> > Well, it contradicts your claim that 'Git is winning in the
> > marketplace', which is total nonsense if you look at the surveys (SVN
> > 50% vs. GIT 13% 'marketshare').
> If you read the thread carefully, you'll see I was talking about the DVCS
> marketplace (in fact, just about Git vs Mercurial), where SVN is not a
Ahh, so it's already a done deal to switch Boost to a DVCS? I was not aware
of this. Interesting...
> Please tone down the 'tude, friend.
The fact that you were referring to DVCS only was not obvious to me, even
after rereading the thread from a-z.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk