Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Beren Minor (beren.minor+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-20 06:36:18
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Sergiu Dotenco
> On 20.03.2012 10:56, Beren Minor wrote:
> The interpretation of Google hits as a popularity measure is very bold.
> The results you're mentioning can also suggest that Git users are more
> likely to require additional support. In previous comments, which you
> haven't read, it has been pointed out that the perceivable market share
> does not correlate with how well a tool integrates with a system. This
> is especially true when comparing Git and Mercurial.
Let's compare open-source projects on Ohloh then instead of Google if
you like it more http://www.ohloh.net/repositories/compare, but's it's
not what I wanted to point out. As I said, I won't be able to provide
any argument convincing everyone anyway.
-- Beren Minor
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk