Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Sergiu Dotenco (sergiu.dotenco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-20 10:28:59
On 20.03.2012 14:56, Bruno Santos wrote:
> On 20/03/2012, at 12:59, Sergiu Dotenco wrote:
>> On 20.03.2012 12:01, Bruno Santos wrote:
>>> I wasn't referring to mercurial, I was referring to the history. So you're are well aware of how history works you don't mess up things like Anthony exemplified.
>>> I don't what to edit shared history, I want to edit what's not shared or even deleted it.
>>> The fact is mercurial resembles to much of svn. [...]
>> This statement is not only wrong but actually demonstrates that you have
>> absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
> There is no point in arguing with someone that only dismiss other people arguments and to that end will pick a specific sentence and disregard the rest to take it out of context.
You didn't provide any valid arguments, only self-proclaimed facts.
Unless I'm missing something, there's also no specific context.
> You have yet to provided an argument/opinion in favor of mercurial. So unless you have something to say about mercurial there is no point in this discussion, I have better things to do.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk