Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?

Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-21 09:04:34

On 21/03/12 13:22, Thomas Heller wrote:

>> To be honest I don't know what's the right way to deal with published
>> forks.
>
> Right, and isn't this exactly what is advocated here as one of the big
> advantages of git in specific and DCVS's in general?

Is it?
I didn't follow all discussions, I wasn't aware the ability to publish 
forks was advocated as "one of the big advantages of Git".

To me, it's certainly way past the big advantages.