Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Mercurial?
From: Philippe Vaucher (philippe.vaucher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-21 09:15:57
> But as this discussion evolves, I get the impression that it gets overly
> complicated when more than one public repository is involved.
See how github.com handles it... I don't see what the problem is.
There'd be one big central repository for boost, then a myriad of forks can
exist if necessary and the maintainers would pick commits/patches from
those forks as wanted.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk