Re: [boost] [range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-23 23:14:48

on Fri Mar 23 2012, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen-AT-dezide.com> wrote:

> On 3/23/2012 4:20 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> One possibility:
>>>
>>>   - make adaptor expressions return const rvalues. The const rvalues will
>>>     bind to T&  arguments (where T is a template parameter) by deducing T
>>>     to be const.
>
> I don't like this one.

and your specific objection is...?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com