Subject: Re: [boost] [range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-23 23:14:48
on Fri Mar 23 2012, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen-AT-dezide.com> wrote:
> On 3/23/2012 4:20 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>> One possibility:
>>> - make adaptor expressions return const rvalues. The const rvalues will
>>> bind to T& arguments (where T is a template parameter) by deducing T
>>> to be const.
> I don't like this one.
and your specific objection is...?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk