Subject: Re: [boost] [range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-26 05:11:56
On 3/24/2012 4:14 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Fri Mar 23 2012, Thorsten Ottosen<thorsten.ottosen-AT-dezide.com> wrote:
>> On 3/23/2012 4:20 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>>> One possibility:
>>>> - make adaptor expressions return const rvalues. The const rvalues will
>>>> bind to T& arguments (where T is a template parameter) by deducing T
>>>> to be const.
>> I don't like this one.
> and your specific objection is...?
well, it would require the other solution as well before it works. So
the other solution is simpler.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk