Re: [boost] [range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-26 05:11:56

On 3/24/2012 4:14 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
> on Fri Mar 23 2012, Thorsten Ottosen<thorsten.ottosen-AT-dezide.com>  wrote:
>
>> On 3/23/2012 4:20 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> One possibility:
>>>>
>>>>    - make adaptor expressions return const rvalues. The const rvalues will
>>>>      bind to T&   arguments (where T is a template parameter) by deducing T
>>>>      to be const.
>>
>> I don't like this one.
>
> and your specific objection is...?

well, it would require the other solution as well before it works. So 
the other solution is simpler.

-Thorsten