Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc]
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-25 15:41:09


> Based on this I really have reservations that GSOC is really
> useful to boost. Also, given Google's coding guidlines,
> which explicitly proscribe most of boost and most of C++11,
> I don't see how Google would find boost a match for them.

That's interesting. I can understand C++11, being as it is relatively
new, but do you know why Google's coding guidelines proscribe
most of boost?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at