Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc]
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-25 15:41:09
> Based on this I really have reservations that GSOC is really
> useful to boost. Also, given Google's coding guidlines,
> which explicitly proscribe most of boost and most of C++11,
> I don't see how Google would find boost a match for them.
That's interesting. I can understand C++11, being as it is relatively
new, but do you know why Google's coding guidelines proscribe
most of boost?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk