Re: [boost] [gsoc]

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc]
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-25 16:53:41

Nathan Ridge wrote:
> [ASIDE]
>
>> Based on this I really have reservations that GSOC is really
>> useful to boost.  Also, given Google's coding guidlines,
>> which explicitly proscribe most of boost and most of C++11,
>> I don't see how Google would find boost a match for them.
>
> That's interesting. I can understand C++11, being as it is relatively
> new, but do you know why Google's coding guidelines proscribe
> most of boost?

Look it up - they've explained their rationale on a point by point basis
>
> Regards,
> Nate
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost