Subject: Re: [boost] [svn/git/hg] Support for modularization of Boost?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-11 10:15:33
on Wed Apr 11 2012, Martin Geisler <mg-AT-aragost.com> wrote:
> I'm happy to see the talk about 0install, which I understand is a tool
> that will manage the dependencies better.
I'm currently standing up 0install feeds for modularized boost,
This is work-in-progress; installation doesn't complete because of the
many usage dependencies (other libraries you need in order to use
Signals2) that I haven't generated feeds for yet, but you can see it
beginning to work if you try it (and anyone who wants to help is most
The use of 0install makes modularization a non-issue where the DVCS is
concerned, so I truly don't think it's worth hashing over the different
ways you can handle this with Hg or Git or SVN.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk