Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [disjoint_sets] 1.49.0 docs out-of-date? pending?
From: Giovanni Piero Deretta (gpderetta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-18 10:23:01

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 17 April 2012 01:21, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.
> <jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> So, aside from what looks like
>> a slight error in the present disjoint_sets docs, what is the purpose of
>> this pending directory? I had never noticed it before and I don't remember
>> stumbling upon a reference to it until now. Looks like it contains a
>> hodgepodge of miscellaneous headers...
> Coincidentally, I noticed this about disjoint_sets last week. The
> pending directory was used to store headers for libraries that hadn't
> been reviewed, which seems to be the case for disjoint sets. I'm going
> to remove it from the library list on the site, but the headers should
> remain, as other parts of boost depend on them. I'm not sure what to
> do with the library directory and documentation though. I don't like
> that it has a library directory, but also don't want to delete it and
> I don't know where to put it.  I suppose if we go ahead with
> modularization, then it's probably best to wait until then. I'll
> probably add a note and fix the header in the documentation before the
> next release though.

Isn't disjoint set used by Boost.Graph (and written by the same team)?
Maybe the documentation should be under boost.graph, the same way that
phoenix was hosted under spirit for a long time before being reviewed.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at