Subject: Re: [boost] Slow Bugs Tracker
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-19 12:29:10
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Olaf van der Spek <ml_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Oh my! I hadn't heard about that at all. It does complicate things
>> quite a bit. On first inspection it looks like ChiliProject has more
>> energy than Redmine but of course it's hard to know if these things will
>> sustain themselves. I guess under these circumstances I'd be inclined
>> to suggest that we first try a Trac instance hosted at OSUOSL and see if
>> that changes anything, to give us a little more time to see if
>> ChiliProject looks like it's going to win. Getting off Trac makes sense
>> in the long run for various reasons, but that can wait if we can get a
>> speedup in some other way.
>>> Also, Redmine being faster looks true for my experience, BUT the scale of
>>> boost project and the fact that a lot of people can access it makes me
>>> think that maybe Redmine will be as slow as TRAC for this project with the
>>> same hardware
>> We wouldn't be constrained to the same hardware; it would be hosted by
>> OSUOSL, which has more resources.
> Who will perform the move?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk