Subject: Re: [boost] Slow Bugs Tracker
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-12 15:08:54
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Oh my! I hadn't heard about that at all. It does complicate things
> quite a bit. On first inspection it looks like ChiliProject has more
> energy than Redmine but of course it's hard to know if these things will
> sustain themselves. I guess under these circumstances I'd be inclined
> to suggest that we first try a Trac instance hosted at OSUOSL and see if
> that changes anything, to give us a little more time to see if
> ChiliProject looks like it's going to win. Getting off Trac makes sense
> in the long run for various reasons, but that can wait if we can get a
> speedup in some other way.
>> Also, Redmine being faster looks true for my experience, BUT the scale of
>> boost project and the fact that a lot of people can access it makes me
>> think that maybe Redmine will be as slow as TRAC for this project with the
>> same hardware
> We wouldn't be constrained to the same hardware; it would be hosted by
> OSUOSL, which has more resources.
Who will perform the move?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk