|
Boost : |
Subject: [boost] [concept_check] addable
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-20 01:22:18
Dave Abrahams wrote
>
> on Thu Apr 19 2012, lcaminiti <lorcaminiti-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Does this Addable concept definition make sense to you?
>
> Well, it "makes sense," but...
>
>> Is there any error?
>
> That depends on what concept constraints you're trying to express. This
> definition tests that x + y is convertible to T.
>
I wanted to check that there exist an operator+ from T x T to T "T
operator+(T, T)" so I think that is what Addable<T> checks... maybe the
Sun's linker errors below are from something else (I've changed a regression
test to get more info when it cycles tomorrow).
>> #include <boost/concept_check.hpp>
>>
>> template<typename T>
>> struct Addable { // User-defined concept.
>> BOOST_CONCEPT_USAGE(Addable) {
>> return_type(x + y); // Check addition `T operator+(T x, T y)`.
>> }
>>
>> private:
>> T x;
>> T y;
>>
>> void return_type(T const&); // Used to check addition returns type
>> `T`.
>> };
>>
>> It's not making Sun's linker happy:
>>
>> "/opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/CC" -g -library=stlport4 -features=tmplife
>> -features=tmplrefstatic -library=stlport4 -m64 -KPIC -o
>> "/scratch2/kbelco/boost/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/local_function/test/typeof_seq.test/sun-5.10/debug/address-model-64/stdlib-sun-stlport/typeof_seq"
>> "/scratch2/kbelco/boost/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/local_function/test/typeof_seq.test/sun-5.10/debug/address-model-64/stdlib-sun-stlport/typeof_seq.o"
>> -Bdynamic -lrt -Bstatic -Bdynamic
>>
>> Undefined???first referenced
>> symbol ??? in file
>> void Addable<int>::return_type(const int&)
>> /scratch2/kbelco/boost/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/local_function/test/typeof_seq.test/sun-5.10/debug/address-model-64/stdlib-sun-stlport/typeof_seq.o
>> ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
>> /scratch2/kbelco/boost/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/local_function/test/typeof_seq.test/sun-5.10/debug/address-model-64/stdlib-sun-stlport/typeof_seq
>>
>> But the error might also be somewhere else in the program that checks the
>> concept, I'm still debugging...
>
Thanks,
--Lorenzo
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-concept-check-addable-tp4572138p4572895.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk