Subject: Re: [boost] [OT][RFC] standardized compile-time reflection
From: Roman Perepelitsa (roman.perepelitsa_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-23 14:31:55
2012/4/20 Matus Chochlik <chochlik_at_[hidden]>
> Afterwards I discussed it with several people including
> Dean Michael Berris, who is the co-author of n3340 "Rich pointers"
> and is also interested in adding run-time (and static) reflection to C++.
> We've decided that we merge the ideas from my paper into his
> proposal (which has not happened yet and will probably take a while).
Compile-time reflection may be more inline with the spirit of C++,
specifically the preference of no-overhead abstractions. Be careful with
binding your work too closely with runtime reflection -- don't let it sink
your proposal. This might be even more dangerous given that both proposals
are quite heavy and will probably take years to mature.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk