Re: [boost] [OT][RFC] standardized compile-time reflection

Subject: Re: [boost] [OT][RFC] standardized compile-time reflection
From: Julien Nitard (julien.nitard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-23 19:51:51

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Roman Perepelitsa
<roman.perepelitsa_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Compile-time reflection may be more inline with the spirit of C++,
> specifically the preference of no-overhead abstractions. Be careful with
> binding your work too closely with runtime reflection -- don't let it sink
> your proposal. This might be even more dangerous given that both proposals
> are quite heavy and will probably take years to mature.

+1