Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: extended complex number library
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-02 04:34:29
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Matthieu
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 9:51 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: extended complex number library
> The original question still remains. Should a boost::complex class rely on the std::complex
> no matter how (im-)precise or should boost provide a truly precise complex class.
Believing that 'if a little does it well, a lot will do it better', I would say go for a truly
precise complex class.
But if both behaviours can not-too-painfully be provided using a macro, that might please everyone.
--- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk